Lawyer Gal's Blog

A Young Lawyer's Perspective

Can you get a DUI for sleeping in your vehicle?

In criminal law, I’ve noticed a lot of misconceptions from the general public.  I sincerely hope that these articles help to debunk some of those legal myths.  Here are a few that come to the top of my head, which I will discuss in more details down the road:

1. murders and rapists get out in a few years.  WRONG!  Rape and murder are severe felonies that carry a mandatory prison sentence.  Judges must follow the statute and sentence the offenders accordingly.

2.  the victim always remembers the defendant’s face. WRONG!  Eye witness identification is highly faulty and is the basis of many wrongful convictions.

3.  people convicted of possessing child porn are pedophiles.  WRONG!  Possession does not mean creation of the material. Many possessors have never had any illicit contact with kids.

4. defense attorneys are money hungry, scum of the earth.  LOL maybe!  No, really – you will think differently when you need one.

But the subject of this article is one myth that I’ve heard on countless occasions.  So let me answer it for you – I think it is very practical and helpful to know.

In criminal law, each crime has “elements” that must be satisfied.  Every element must be satisfied.  Therefore, if one element is lacking, then the prosecution cannot prove the case.  Simple as that!  A DUI, actually called an OVI in Ohio, requires the following if it involves alcohol:

1. operation;

2.  .08% alcohol in system as determined by blood, urine or breath.

Pretty simple, really.  Operation is one element that can be attacked by defense attorneys and produce fruitful results.  A couple of years ago when I first started working for a defense attorney, I spent an entire day reading case law on what exactly constitutes “operation.”  The issues was: can you operate a vehicle that is malfunctioning? As you can imagine, there aren’t many cases where a drunk dude tries to start a vehicle without an engine.  [That would be a pretty fun argument though! ]  Most cases involve a drunk person who was driving, and then his car broke down.  Those cases are pretty rare…but a state can win on a theory that operation doesn’t have to be present ambulation, especially if there is evidence that the person had driven.

Police officers and prosecutors had a lot of trouble “diagnosing” the cases where a drunk motorist was found asleep at the wheel, often with the heat or AC running.  The General Assembly passed a gap-filling law called “Physical Control.”  Basically, this requires

1. driver is in front seat, with control of keys.

2. .08+

Ok, so now that I’ve given some background on DUI elements, lets apply them to different scenarios.

1.  A drunk dude is found sleeping in his running car on the side of a highway.  Chances are, he’ll be hit with a DUI because there is good evidence he drove there.

2.  A drunk guy is found at a bar parking lot with his car running.  The state might charge a DUI, but I seriously doubt it would win at trial, especially not in Cuyahoga County.  The 8th Appellate District is very strict: unless there is evidence of movement, then it is physical control, not DUI.

3. A drunk dude is found passed out in the front seat of his car at a bar parking lot, keys in his hand.  Under a strict statutory interpretation, he could be charged with physical control – all that is required is control of keys.

4. Id on the facts, but this time, keys are back seat, driver in front.  Although he might be charged with physical control, his car will be impounded and he’ll have to hire an attorney, I highly doubt any court would take such a broad interpretation of “control” to include this fact pattern.

5.  Drunk dude is in back seat, car is off.  Keys are nearby.  No physical control, because he isn’t in front seat.  Again, I’m not completely confident that cops would know the subtle nuances of the law, so I would advise people who sleep in their backseat to print off a copy of ORC 4511.94 and keep it in the glove box.  Even though there is no way you’d get convicted of a physical control violation, it would still be a pain to have your car impounded.

6. This one is a toughy: person has vehicle on in bar lot, no evidence of moving, and is sleeping in back seat.  I think he could be charged with physical control, because there is evidence that he was in the front seat at one point, even leaning in.

So, in summary: sleeping it off is GOOD.  You won’t break the law if you are in the back or passenger seat and your vehicle is off.

Also in summary: sleeping it off is GOOD so long as you don’t hurl all over your car.  


May 13, 2010 - Posted by | Uncategorized

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: